Peanut Butter Fingers

Living a Life Fueled by Healthy Food and Fitness

Navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Who’s Who
    • All About NASM
    • Disclaimer
    • Wedding
  • Recipe Index
  • Workouts
  • Pregnancy
    • Pregnancy + Baby #2
    • Pregnancy + Baby #3
    • Miscarriages
  • Baby
  • Shop + Favs
    • My Amazon Shop
    • Codes + Discounts
    • Books
    • Blogging
  • Travel
    • Orlando & Florida
    • Blog Travel

Ideal Engagement Length

July 6, 2011 by Julie 202 Comments

This afternoon I had lunch plans with my friend Laurel! She got engaged on Saturday night and even though I saw her on Sunday morning, I was more than excited for our lunch date today to hear all about her wedding day ideas and plans.

Once I picked her up, we headed out for a yummy lunch of fresh salads.

               salad greens and grille 001

Why do salads taste so much better when someone else makes them for me?

My salad was very flavorful and perfectly fresh. A definite winner!

              salad greens and grille 002

Laurel and I finished our meals quickly but kept talking until she had to go back to work. She already has a potential date in mind for her big day and it’s sooner than she initially thought it would be, which is very exciting! I can’t wait to be there as everything unfolds.

As the friend of a bride, I love short engagements! I get so excited for all of the wedding fun to start and want it all to happen now.

According to this article, the average American engagement is 14 months. Ryan and I were engaged for 13 months, but we both said we felt like you don’t need that much time as long as you can find a venue in a shorter amount of time. Once the place for the ceremony and reception is lined up, finding other vendors, flowers, a dress, etc. all seem to come together pretty fast (though it did take me a million different tries to find my dress). I honestly felt like Ryan and didn’t do anything for a good four to five months in the middle of our engagement other than wait.

                 156327_10100148889595902_5106195_54620897_1787717_n

Questions of the Afternoon

  • What do you think is the ideal length of an engagement?
  • How long were you engaged/ How long would you like to be engaged?

Be sure to follow PBFingers on Instagram and Facebook!

I'd love to connect with you! I am always so grateful when you let me know you tried one of my recipes or workouts and tag me in your photos or updates. Thank you so much!!!

Filed Under: Lunch Tagged With: lunch, salad

About Julie

My name is Julie and I am a full-time blogger, new mama, fitness enthusiast (certified personal trainer and group exercise instructor) and food fanatic (mostly healthy... but also not-so-healthy) living in North Carolina with my husband, dog and baby boy. Thank you for visiting Peanut Butter Fingers! I hope you enjoy little glimpses into my life and have fun trying the sweaty workouts I frequently share and making some of my favorite recipes along the way!

« La Bouche Lover
Fun with Florida Swim Network »

Comments

  1. Katie @ Healthy Heddleston says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    I was engaged for 13 months as well — 9 months was required by our church. We didn’t do months as well… especially since I lived in hawaii during 2.5 of those months 😛

    Reply
  2. Shari @ Chicago Cuisine Critique says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    I would like to be engaged at least a year. I think it gives enough time for planning and enjoying that time together. It is hopefully the only time you will have that period with anyone, ever. 🙂

    Reply
  3. Jess@atasteofconfidence says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    That’s an interesting question! I think 13/14 is good— some waiting is nice! But I also understand why some couples have longer engagements with little planning going on for a while. I think I’d like to be engaged for a bit over a year to keep it relaxed but fun!

    Reply
  4. Holly @ The Runny Egg says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    The ideal engagement length? No clue. Jason and I were engaged for 5 months — it was enough time for us to plan our small ceremony and I remember feeling like we were waiting too long!

    Reply
  5. Tessa says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    I think the ideal length for an engagement depends on how long you’ve been dating each other. 9 months – a year sounds about right to me if you’ve been with your fiance for at least a full year prior to the engagement. Everyone’s different though!

    Reply
  6. Hope says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    I like this question. 🙂 I’ve been engaged since the end of March (roughly 3 months). We are planning on getting married in August of 2012. So we are almost about a month away. We are still in the process of finding a venue. 🙂

    Reply
    • Hope says

      July 6, 2011 at 2:27 pm

      *not a month away, I mean a year away! Haha.

      Reply
      • peanutbutterfingers says

        July 6, 2011 at 2:31 pm

        congrats on your upcoming wedding, hope!

        Reply
        • Hope says

          July 6, 2011 at 5:08 pm

          Thank you, Julie! 🙂

          Reply
    • Shannon says

      July 6, 2011 at 4:06 pm

      That is almost EXACTLY what I’m doing too 🙂 We got engaged in April and will be married August 11, 2012. We just found a venue and booked it and are not planning on doing anything else until this fall. I think that it will be nice to relax for a bit. I tend to get stressed out about planning events 🙂 Congrats on your upcoming wedding 🙂

      Reply
      • Hope says

        July 6, 2011 at 5:09 pm

        Thank you! You too!! 🙂

        Reply
      • Daniella @Runner at Heart says

        July 6, 2011 at 9:30 pm

        I am getting married that same day.

        Reply
  7. Shanna, Like Banana says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    I was engaged for just under 13 months and that was plenty of time.

    I think I could have done it in 6 months, but perhaps 9 months is ideal.

    Reply
  8. Miranda says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    I think that the ideal length is anywhere from 10-14 months. We were engaged for 12 months, and it gave us plenty of time to figure everything out, including lots of DIY and personal touches. There were a few wrenches thrown in our plans during that time (venue closed/new owners, we moved to another state) but since we had a year to plan, we had the time to fix everything and make it the perfect day.
    I’ve known people who have had 5 month engagements and their events turned out perfectly. I suppose it all depends on how good of a planner you are and if you are willing to ask for help when you need it (I was not…hence the nice long engagement!).

    Reply
  9. The Teenage Taste says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    I think the ideal engagement should be around a year, if not a few months less. I know a couple who were engaged for almost 2 years before finally tying the knot. Wayyyy too long if you ask me! 😕

    Reply
  10. Sarah @ goingongoals says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    I am currently engaged. Our engagement will last 14 months and I agree it feels long. We have a lot of things already lined up so now we are just waiting.

    Reply
  11. Sarah says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    14 months seems like a solid engagement time to me. I know nothing about how long it takes to plan a wedding so I feel like I’ll need as much time as possible!

    Reply
  12. Jamie aka "Sometimes Healthy" Girl says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    hmmm interesting question! My brother and his fiance would probably get married tomorrow if they could, but their venue was booked for 18 months, so they’re in for the long haul. I think they wish the engagement was a bit shorter.

    Now, for ME, I’m aiming for a short engagement. The goal of meeting someone by 25 has come and gone. In three weeks, I’ll be 28. I am certainly not gettin’ any younger. So, I’d be just fine with 9-12 months for an engagement. Now, all I need is the groom-to-be 🙂

    Reply
  13. Victoria (District Chocoholic) says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    I don’t plan to get married, so it’s hard to say, but when my brother told me that he was engaged, I told him to get on a plane to the Caribbean the next day and elope so that he wouldn’t have to deal with family meddling in wedding planning.

    Reply
  14. Jenny says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    I’ve always had the thought in my head that you should date for at least a year before becoming engaged, be engaged for at least a year before getting married, and be married for at least a year (preferably around the 3-5 mark) before having children. A college professor confirmed this for me a few years ago.

    She mentioned that people change with the seasons and with their circumstances. Being engaged in a relationship creates a different dynamic than being in a committed relationship; and as the year goes by their attitude will change. So hopefully by the time you’ve married, you’ve experience enough of that person to continue the relationship with a happy married life!

    Reply
    • peanutbutterfingers says

      July 6, 2011 at 2:33 pm

      i had a child development teacher in high school say couples should date for at least 3 yrs. before getting engaged! so interesting to hear different perspectives!

      Reply
    • Katie says

      July 6, 2011 at 2:50 pm

      I totally agree with this! Of course if it’s not possible for whatever reason, it’s not possible, but I believe it’s important to get to know your spouse through and through before having kids. As your relationship naturally develops over time, it needs attention to get into its long-term happy place so that you can provide the best example of marriage to your kids. Plus, there are all kinds of crazy-in-love chemicals your brain produces during the first 2-3 years of a relationship, so it helps to make sure that a true connection is still there once the dopamine wears off 🙂

      Reply
      • Courtney @ Girl In The Pink says

        July 6, 2011 at 4:03 pm

        I agree! You need to get through the “honeymoon” phase before getting engaged! My husband and I dated for four years and were engaged for 9 months! We were young and in school when we met so I felt like 4 hrs of dating was a good length for us!

        Reply
    • Lea @ healthy coconut says

      July 6, 2011 at 7:47 pm

      I love this comment and the reasoning behind the timeline.

      I got engaged a year after we dated. I got married a year after we got engaged. The timeline was not on purpose but each step happened when it felt right.

      Reply
  15. Lindsay says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    13 months for me! and that was more than enough time to accomplish everything! however, i did like having enough time for the many showers and parties we were graciously given 🙂 🙂

    Reply
  16. Anne @strawberryjampackedlife says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    We were engaged for 15 months, however I think that was mostly due to the timing of everything. We were engaged in Feb 2010, and my brother didn’t come home from Afghanistan until Sept 2010. Originally (before my brother was deployed), I wanted to get married in Sept, but that didn’t really work. So we waited until May 2011, you know for warmer weather. Plus we avoided a conflict with football season in the fall!

    Ideally, I’d say 9-12 months. If you want the best choice of vendors (which can be hard to come by), you want as long as possible.

    Reply
  17. Brittany says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    My husband and I just discussed this last weekend! I think the ideal engagement length is about 11-12 months. His thoughts are “the sooner, the better” (easier said by the groom, right?). That said, we were engaged 22 months, almost two full years!, before we got married. I’m still not sure why we chose a date so far out, but part of it was definitely that I felt 22 was a tad young to get married. Lots of factors go into that decision!

    Reply
    • Carrie @ Confessions of a Dietitian says

      July 6, 2011 at 2:32 pm

      haha, I just posted the same thing right below. got married at 22, engaged for 2 years!

      Reply
  18. Carrie @ Confessions of a Dietitian says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    I was engaged for almost 2 years! I didn’t really do any planning for the first year. We were 20 and in college when we got engaged, so not in a huge hurry. I thought he would wait another year or so to propose, but nope! I also wasn’t huge into wedding planning.

    Salads made by someone else are infinitely more delicious than ones I make. It is magic. This is also true for sandwiches.

    Reply
  19. Em says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    I planned our wedding in 5 months. But my husband is military and we wanted to have the wedding before he left. It can be done!

    Reply
  20. Sarah says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    As someone who just got engaged on Monday…whoop whoop…I think at least a year. But I think anything over a year and a half would be too long for me.

    Reply
    • peanutbutterfingers says

      July 6, 2011 at 2:34 pm

      ahhhh! congrats! very exciting!

      Reply
  21. Karen at Losing to Win says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    We were engaged for 6 months, eloped and then are having the party in a few months. So if we got married at our party, it would have been a 10 month engagement. That probably didn’t make any sense!

    Reply
  22. Annette @ EnjoyYourHealthyLife says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    I think for each is different….we were engaged for 11 WEEKS!! And everything came together perfectly 🙂 We loved each other, knew where we were getting married, and wanted to seal the deal soon.

    It was the perfect day 🙂

    Reply
    • peanutbutterfingers says

      July 6, 2011 at 2:34 pm

      oh my gosh! you’re hardcore! so glad your day was perfect. 🙂

      Reply
  23. Alyssa @ Life of bLyss says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:32 pm

    I’m the maid of honor for a wedding to be held on July 29th… and they got engaged at the end of february! I can definitely say that short of an engagement kept us on our toes as far as planning went, but if you like planning in a fast-paced manner, it was doable!

    Reply
  24. Elizabeth @ reads recipes runs says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:32 pm

    I was engaged for 14 months! I agree, it was a little long. I think that my planning timeline was about 9 months, which was a nice length, but I think it just depends a lot on the type of wedding you want 🙂 Congrats to your friend!

    Reply
  25. Jenny @ Fitness Health and Food says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    haha this is definitely controversial topic to my in laws.

    I DARED propose to my now husband after we had been dating for a year. My hubs and I wanted to get married 8 months later (before my dad passed away) but there were quite a few opinions about that. 🙁

    So we had a bit more than a year and a half long engagement.

    My parents met in march and were married in november of the same year! Happily married for 37 years before my dad died.

    To each their own! 🙂

    Reply
  26. Alex @ The Plum Foodie says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    How about this for a short engagement: 2 1/2 months! After talking/daydreaming about eloping, I decided I wanted a real wedding with all of our family and friends there. We had been dating for 2 years prior and just wanted to get to the alter!!! 5 years together and 3 years married – couldn’t be happier 🙂

    Reply
  27. Khushboo says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    Indian weddings are always elaborate so I know planning will be nuts- I would like a 6-8 month engagement period…or so I’m thinking as of now!

    Reply
    • peanutbutterfingers says

      July 6, 2011 at 2:36 pm

      ryan and i were able to peek in on an indian wedding that was partially held outdoors when we were in atlanta and it looked amazing! so detailed and elaborate! we were in awe!

      Reply
  28. Katie (dailymaiermusings.blogspot.com) says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    I was engaged for 14 months and it felt toooooo long. Looking back though, it was necessary because it took my dress 9 months, I got my wedding planner’s last weekend of the year, and our photographer and limo service were both booking a year in advance…so it worked out!

    We actually contemplated just going and secretly getting married, but didn’t. In retrospect, I am glad we had a long engagement because it meant I got everything I wanted. I was also only 22 when we got engaged, so it gave me another year to grow and mature!

    Reply
  29. Brittany @ Healthy Slice says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    It probably depends on how long you’ve been dating and how old you are. Hubbs and I were engaged for 11 months, but I could have gone shorter. 7 months sounds good!

    Reply
  30. Mary says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    I was only engaged for 4 months and I think it was plenty of time. I already knew exactly what I wanted and had so many family and friends who were eager to pitch in and help. Honestly, I don’t think I could have survived a longer engagement, I just wanted to be married! We had a simple wedding and did it on a budget, but I wouldn’t have it any other way.

    I think 6-10 months would be reasonable for most people.. It is plenty of time to get everything together and still breathe lol! It seems like if the engagement is longer there is just a lot of waiting and things still get put off until the last minute

    Reply
  31. Carolyn @ cool beans says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    I honestly think it totally depends on what stage of your life you’re at, what kind of wedding you want, and who you are! I’ve been engaged since September and am getting married in August – the only reason we put it off is because we had just moved to the UK and weren’t planning to come back to Canada (our home!) until the summer. We are doing it all DIY – and will have less than a month to prepare! Maybe not ideal planning wise, but we are anxious to start our lives together!

    Reply
  32. McKenzie says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    My husband and I were engaged for 9 months and that was more than enough time to plan a wedding. We initially had picked a date that would have been 13-14 months away but changed venues and moved the date up. I couldn’t be happier. The more time I would have had would have just given me more time to change my mind about the choices I’d made with the flowers, decorations, etc. I definitely think it is different for everyone, but I am an impatient person and like to get things moving. 🙂

    Reply
  33. Lauren @ Lawfully Wedded Wife says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    I think the right engagement time is probably different for every person depending on their lifestyle and what they want for their wedding. My engagement was almost 2 years, and because I had a job and was a full-time student, that was just the right amount of time for me! Any less time and we would have been scrambling to get everything we wanted done. Just depends on the couple! 🙂

    Reply
  34. Ashley O. @ The Vegetable Life says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    I was engaged for 18 months which was a long time. We did not do a thing until 12 months (when we actually picked a date) and then we slowly pieced things together. You are definetly right that there are 3-5 months in the middle where you don’t do much.. there is a definite push in the begining and then again in the end. It can definetly be done in less than a year!

    Reply
  35. Maria says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    I think if your life isn’t too crazy at the moment, you can plan a beautiful wedding in 6 months. My friend’s engagement is only three months, but her mom and sister are doing a ton of scrambling for her.

    I on the other hand, will have been engaged for 27 (!) months by the time we get married in September. I had grad school to finish up, then our jobs got insane. While I did have a lot of down time and waiting during the planning period, we were able to save up a ton of money for our honeymoon and some nice touches for our wedding. So I guess the length really depends on your schedule and of course, the availability of your venue/catering top choices.

    Reply
  36. Jordan @ food, sweat, and beers says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:37 pm

    I’ve noticed that, for my female friends, the older they tend to be, the shorter they want their engagement!! I blame the fact that ladies have a biological clock they hear ticking, but it’s interesting when I see young friends who are engaged for over a year… I think it might have something to do with how sure they are and how much time they need to put things together.

    Also, some of the younger women and men I know who get married need longer times to raise the money for what’s likely one of the more expensive days of their lives!!

    For me, I think a year would be sufficient as I’d want to add a lot of personal DIY touches, and make sure that I get the venue and date I wanted!

    Reply
  37. Kristen @ notsodomesticated says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:37 pm

    I don’t think that there’s any ideal length… it’s just whatever is best for each individual couple. I couldn’t imagine having too long of an engagement myself, but that’s just me. I was very ready to be married to Brandon! 🙂

    We were engaged for 8 months. That was plenty of time to do all of the wedding preparation. And by the end, I was itching to get down that aisle! Of course, I also lived with a family that I barely knew while we were engaged (they let me stay with them for free until we got married… how nice is that?!). I didn’t move in with Brandon until after the honeymoon. So that’s a big reason why I was getting “itchy” haha! 😉

    Reply
  38. laura says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:37 pm

    We got engaged in April of this year, after being together for about 7 years, and since we knew we wanted an end-of-summer wedding, we had to choose between a 5 month engagement or a 17 month one – we went with 5, and I’m having the best time! It’s stressful, and we’ve had to be pretty flexible, but that works for us. I always end up taking as much time as I have anyway; I can’t imagine living with a to-do list this long for more than a year! Plus, I’m already SO excited and can’t wait for the actual day – if it were a whole year away, I think I’d explode. 🙂

    Reply
  39. allison @ thesundayflog says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:37 pm

    i want to be engaged for about 18 months. i say this only because i hope to be engaged next spring and married the following fall (just season-wise). i agree about engagement length only as long as you need to find the venue

    Reply
  40. Corrie Anne says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:37 pm

    We were engaged for 7 months, honestly we did everything in the last 2 months except choose the dress, venue, and wedding party. It would’ve been PLENTY of time if had been in the States to work on it. Since I was out of the country until the last two and a half weeks, it was a little bit stressful planning online/over the phone.

    I think 6-8 months is plenty long if you know you want to get married. Unless you really want to wait for summer or whatever. JUST DO IT! 🙂

    Reply
  41. Sarah Jayne says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    Ahhh I am JUST about to post an update regarding that very article!! We got engaged in October and our wedding is THIS WEEKEND!! So…nine months was perfect for us 😉

    I only wish I had time for more DIY projects…It seems like I find something fun and new online every single day!

    Reply
  42. Paula @ Eat: Watch: Run says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    Interesting. I was engaged for 14 months. We waited so we could save money mostly but also I wanted my wedding in either Feb or March because it’s too hot any other time in Florida.

    Of course, I ended up going to Vegas instead. But the weather was perfect there in March, so it worked out.

    I did a lot of waiting in the meantime too. I think 9-12 months would probably be ideal.

    Reply
  43. Angela @ Eat Spin Run Repeat says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    I think it all depends on how long you’ve known each other (after all, you do want to make sure it’s the right choice!) and how much time you have to plan. Like you said, if you can find a venue etc and get all the arrangements made fairly quickly, I don’t see why it should be drawn out any longer. I think around 1 year is about right.

    Reply
  44. Rachel says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    We were engaged 6 months which worked out great for us, since we were a bit flexible on the date. We got engaged in May and knew we wanted a fall wedding. A year and a half seemed to me like a loong time to wait, so once we were able to snag November 13 at our venue (the last available fall date), we didn’t look back! I didn’t have any problems planning in 6 months – just had to be organized and manage my time well since I was also in grad school and working full time!

    Reply
  45. Lisa @ lisalettinggo says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    I’m like you, whenever a good friend gets engaged I get SO excited and want everything to happen NOW!

    For me, I think a year will be about perfect. I live in another state than most of my long time friends and my family, so having a bit of time to get things planned with out having to freak out will be nice. Now, I’ll just have to wait and see what happens!

    Reply
  46. Eli says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    I just got engaged on June 3. Our engagement will be exactly one year. We are getting married on June 2, 2012. We have gotten the ceremony and reception booked as well as did the cake tasting and have gotten a few little things such as ring pillow/flower basket, invites, candles, etc. There will be a lot of down time since I am not getting my bridal party attire or talking to a florist until next year. Funny thing is some of my bridemaids are getting snarky with me because I am planning things now, yet most reception venues I called were already booked. Shows them I guess. Plus we have a VERY limited budget so i have to do a lot of planning now if I want to get what I want for my budget.

    Reply
  47. Lindsay@ In Sweetness and In Health says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    I don’t know what I think the ideal engagement length is. I would love to get engaged to my bf, but we won’t we wouldn’t be able to get married for 2 years due to grad school- that would be a really long engagement, but I don’t think I would mind if there was a legitimate reason for us to wait on the marriage. Then again, the engagement could just happen later too. Nothing would really change for us other than the title or the fact that I’d have a ring on my finger 🙂

    Reply
  48. Lindsay says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:40 pm

    I don’t really think there is an “ideal” I mean it really depends on the type of wedding, the location and what an engagement means to you. My husband and I were engaged for 12 months and 1 week before we got married but that was do to the fact I had to finish up my last year of university and we were having our wedding in a different location than where we lived.

    Reply
  49. Linda says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:41 pm

    We were engaged for 13 months. It was perfect for us. We paid for everything ourselves and hubby had lost his job just after asking me to marry him. We needed all the time to come up with the money to have a wedding!

    Reply
  50. Amber says

    July 6, 2011 at 2:41 pm

    We were engaged 6 months and we pulled it off together in plenty of time! Considering we had over 300 guest I was pretty proud we actually did it in that amount of time! 9 months would have been ideal though…less stress

    Reply
    • Holly says

      July 6, 2011 at 2:53 pm

      Oh my gosh! 300 guests & you only had 6 months?! YOU GO GIRL 😀 That is AWESOME!!!

      Reply
Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hi! I’m Julie and I am a mom to three energetic boys and a personal trainer and blogger living in Charlotte, North Carolina. Welcome to my blog! Peanut Butter Fingers follows my life and my interests in food, fitness, family, travel and (mostly) healthy living.
NEVER MISS A POST!
FacebookTwitterInstagramPinterestBloglovin
Follow

Search

Fashion Favorites

Beauty Favorites

Items I Swear By

Kid Favorites

Shop My Baby Essentials

Quick Links

  • Favorite Posts
  • Recipe Index
  • Workouts
  • Fashion
  • Pregnancy/Baby
  • Family

Recent Posts

  • Things I’m Loving Friday #557
  • 10 Things to Do in Hilton Head with Kids
  • Ryder is SEVEN!
  • Summer So Far + Orlando Girls’ Trip
  • 10+ First Chapter Books

Categories

Archives

Disclaimer

I am not a registered dietitian. My blog is simply a documentation of my life. The views I express are mine alone, based on my own experiences, and should not be taken as medical advice. I DO NOT post everything I eat. Though I am a certified personal trainer, the workouts I post may not be right for you. Please speak with a medical professional before making any changes to your current routine.

Affiliates

Please note that affiliate links may pop up on PBF from time to time. I greatly appreciate your support!
Privacy Policy

Copyright � 2013 Peanut Butter Fingers / Julie Fagan. All Rights Reserved.
Blog Designed by SWOON CREATIVE